10 Best Practical Effects of 2024 Video Production
Our top 10 picks for practical effects in 2024, and a run-down of both practical and digital special effects in video production.
30-minute read
What makes an on-screen moment truly unforgettable—the raw authenticity of practical effects or the limitless possibilities of digital visuals? This article dives into the enduring craft of practical effects, tracing their evolution and exploring their relevance in everything from big-budget productions to DIY projects. Discover how these tactile techniques bring unmatched realism to modern storytelling, offering inspiration for creators of all levels.
In this article
- Our Favorite Practical Effects from 2024
- The Origins of Practical Effects in Video Production
- Advancement in Practical Effects Over the Decade
- Practical Effects in Different Video Production Sectors
- The Relationship Between Practical Effects, SFX Makeup and Costume Design
- Practical Effects VS Virtual Effects (VFX)
- Inspiration for Everyday Video Production
Our Top 10 Practical Effects of 2025
10. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3
(Marvel Studios) — James Gunn
See the full cast and visual/special effects crew here.
9. Oddity
(Keeper Pictures) — Damian McCarthy
See the full cast and visual/special effects crew here.
8. Dungeons & Dragons
(Paramount Pictures) — John Francis Daley, Jonathan Goldstein
See the full cast and visual/special effects crew here.
7. The Last of Us
(Sony Pictures) — Various Directors
See the full cast and visual/special effects crew here.
6. Dune Part 2
(Legendary Pictures) — Denis Villeneuve
See the full cast and visual/special effects crew here.
5. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice
(The Geffen Company) — Tim Burton
See the full cast and visual/special effects crew here.
4. Five Nights at Freddy’s
(Blumhouse Productions) — Emma Tammi
See the full cast and visual/special effects crew here.
3. Nosferatu
(Maiden Voyage Pictures) — Robert Eggers
See the full cast and visual/special effects crew here.
2. The Substance
(Working Title Films) — Coralie Fargeat
See the full cast and visual/special effects crew here.
1. Alien : Romulus
(Scott Free Productions) — Fede Álvarez
See the full cast and visual/special effects crew here.
The Origins of Practical Effects in Video Production
Early Examples: George Méliès and Early Cinema Tricks
The origins of practical effects trace back to the dawn of cinema, a time when filmmakers relied on ingenuity and physical techniques to captivate audiences. Among the pioneers of these early effects was Georges Méliès, a French illusionist turned filmmaker, whose groundbreaking work in the late 19th and early 20th centuries laid the foundation for modern visual storytelling.
Méliès’s fascination with magic and theater naturally extended into his filmmaking. He saw cinema not just as a medium for documentation but as a tool for creating illusions, capable of bending reality itself.
In 1902, Méliès released A Trip to the Moon (Le Voyage dans la Lune), a silent film that became one of the earliest showcases of practical effects in storytelling. Using techniques such as double exposure, stop motion, and miniatures, Méliès transported viewers to an imaginative lunar adventure.
One of his most iconic tricks, the “stop substitution,” involved stopping the camera mid-shot, altering the scene or props, and resuming filming. This technique allowed Méliès to create magical transformations—objects appeared and disappeared, characters morphed, and impossible feats came to life. For instance, in The Vanishing Lady (1896), a performer seemingly dissolves into thin air, a jaw-dropping illusion that wowed audiences of the time.
The tools at Méliès’s disposal were modest by today’s standards—painted backdrops, handcrafted props, and mechanical devices—but his creativity knew no bounds. His work was a blend of theater, art, and technical experimentation, proving that storytelling could transcend the confines of reality. These early tricks sparked a wave of experimentation in filmmaking. Techniques like matte painting, miniature sets, and rear projection emerged, all inspired by Méliès’s ingenuity. The innovations didn’t just entertain—they also established practical effects as an essential tool for filmmakers, capable of visualizing stories far beyond the limitations of live-action filming. Méliès’s contributions remain a cornerstone of video production history. His techniques, though rudimentary, carried a timeless charm, showcasing the power of creativity over technology. While practical effects have since evolved dramatically, their roots in the handcrafted magic of Méliès remind us that cinema has always been an art of imagination, illusion, and wonder.
Silent Films
As cinema evolved into the 1910s and 1920s, filmmakers began to experiment with visual effects in new and exciting ways—especially in silent films. The absence of synchronized sound opened up a world of creative possibilities for directors to rely heavily on visual storytelling. This period saw an explosion of inventive practical effects, as filmmakers pushed the boundaries of what could be achieved on screen using just the tools available at the time.
One notable example comes from The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920), a German Expressionist masterpiece that utilized innovative set design and camera tricks.
The film’s distorted, angular sets created a dreamlike, nightmarish world, and many of these surreal visuals were achieved through painted backdrops, forced perspectives, and in-camera effects.
The striking, deliberately unnatural look of the film wouldn’t have been possible without the creative use of practical effects, demonstrating how filmmakers could create an entirely new reality for the audience, all through physical, hands-on methods.
Then there’s Metropolis (1927), another groundbreaking silent film that showcased the vast potential of practical effects in grandiose ways.
Director Fritz Lang’s vision for a futuristic dystopian city was brought to life with massive miniatures and intricate mechanical models.
The film’s iconic scene of the massive robot Maria was achieved through practical effects and miniature work that still astonish audiences today, even though the technology used was far from advanced.
In silent films, practical effects played an essential role not just in creating spectacle, but in heightening the emotional intensity of the story. Without spoken dialogue, filmmakers relied heavily on visual techniques to communicate complex ideas and set the mood. The creativity of this era laid the groundwork for generations of filmmakers who would continue to innovate with practical effects in the years to come.
Evolution of Analogue Techniques During Hollywood’s Golden Age
As Hollywood entered its Golden Age in the 1930s and 1940s, the demand for more complex and larger-than-life films grew. This led to an evolution in the use of practical effects, as filmmakers needed new ways to tell increasingly ambitious stories while still working within the technical limits of the time.
One of the most iconic examples from this era is King Kong (1933). Director Merian C. Cooper and special effects pioneer Willis O’Brien created groundbreaking stop-motion animation that brought the legendary ape to life. O’Brien’s meticulous work on the model of Kong, as well as the combination of miniatures and live-action footage, set new standards for creature effects and special effects realism. The result was a film that pushed the boundaries of what audiences thought was possible, all without the aid of CGI.
Another film that showcased the evolution of practical effects during Hollywood’s Golden Age is The Wizard of Oz (1939). Although often remembered for its colorful characters and magical elements, the film’s behind-the-scenes practical effects were nothing short of revolutionary.
From the use of painted backdrops and matte paintings to the innovative use of pyrotechnics for the tornado sequence, the filmmakers relied heavily on practical techniques to create the otherworldly experience of Oz.
The techniques used in The Wizard of Oz helped solidify Hollywood as the hub for visual innovation, demonstrating how practical effects could be integrated into narratives in a seamless and enchanting way.
This era also saw the development of optical effects, such as rear projection and matte paintings.
Rear projection, used in films like Gone with the Wind (1939), allowed filmmakers to show characters interacting with large-scale, filmed backdrops, without the need for on-location shoots.
Matte paintings, on the other hand, allowed filmmakers to create vast landscapes and intricate settings by combining real footage with painted imagery.
These analogue techniques helped push the boundaries of what was possible in visual storytelling before digital effects came onto the scene.
In short, the Golden Age of Hollywood saw a major leap forward in practical effects. Techniques like stop-motion animation, matte paintings, miniatures, and optical illusions were used to create everything from colossal monsters to magical lands. These advancements laid the groundwork for the more modern visual effects techniques we use today, proving that the marriage of creativity and craftsmanship can create cinematic moments that stand the test of time.
Advancement in Practical Effects Over the Decades
Transition to Animatronics and Puppetry
As technology advanced and filmmakers sought even more lifelike creatures and environments, the 1970s and 1980s marked a significant turning point in the evolution of practical effects. The industry saw a major shift from traditional techniques like stop-motion animation to more sophisticated methods like animatronics and puppetry. These innovations allowed filmmakers to create dynamic, interactive creatures and characters that felt more “real” on screen.
One of the most influential films during this era was Star Wars: A New Hope (1977), where George Lucas and his team at Industrial Light & Magic (ILM) helped set the stage for the future of practical effects.
Although Star Wars used a mix of miniature models and other techniques, the film’s creatures were often brought to life through puppetry and animatronics.
The character of Chewbacca, for example, was brought to life through a combination of detailed costumes and mechanical devices that allowed the actor to control Chewbacca’s facial expressions and movements in real time.
Animatronics, the use of motors and electronic systems to bring puppets to life, became a game-changer.
The 1980s saw animatronics really take center stage, most notably in Jurassic Park (1993), where ILM partnered with Stan Winston Studios to create some of the most realistic animatronic dinosaurs ever seen.
The T. rex, in particular, was a triumph in animatronic technology—an actual mechanical dinosaur was built to interact with the cast in certain scenes, with digital effects seamlessly enhancing it in others.
The success of these animatronics opened the door for even more complex and detailed creations, leading to the next phase in practical effects.
Films like The Thing (1982) also showcased the power of animatronics in horror.
Rob Bottin, the film’s special effects mastermind, used a combination of puppets, latex, and motors to create the grotesque transformations of the alien creature, resulting in a series of terrifying and highly detailed practical effects.
The use of animatronics and puppetry in The Thing allowed for some of the most iconic creature designs in film history, all without the need for CGI.
As animatronics and puppetry evolved, they became crucial tools for filmmakers seeking to create tangible, interactive characters.
The integration of these practical effects not only brought realism to the screen but also allowed actors to interact with their environment and co-stars in ways that were far more engaging than using CGI alone.
Even today, animatronics and puppetry continue to be used in projects that require real-world interaction, like the Muppets in The Muppets (2011) or the intricate puppets in The Dark Crystal (1982), proving that practical effects still have an irreplaceable place in the filmmaking world.
Material Science Enabling Lifelike Creations
As the world of practical effects continued to evolve, one area that became increasingly important was material science. By the 1980s and 1990s, advancements in materials like latex, silicone, and foam rubber revolutionized the way creatures, prosthetics, and other effects were created. These materials allowed filmmakers to craft more lifelike, flexible, and durable designs that could be used for both close-up shots and extensive on-screen action.
Latex rubber was one of the most widely used materials in the early days of practical effects. It was lightweight, flexible, and could easily be molded into detailed forms. Latex prosthetics and masks were used in films like An American Werewolf in London (1981), where the groundbreaking transformation scene set a new standard for creature effects.
The lifelike quality of the werewolf transformation, aided by latex prosthetics, helped cement the film’s place as one of the best examples of practical effects in horror.
However, as technology progressed, filmmakers began experimenting with new materials that could take the realism of practical effects even further. One of the most notable advancements was the development of silicone. Silicone rubber has a much more realistic texture and appearance compared to latex, and it can be used to create incredibly lifelike prosthetics that mimic the natural movement and feel of human skin. Silicone is particularly useful for creating detailed facial prosthetics, as it’s soft and flexible enough to move with the actor’s muscles.
Silicone’s impact was particularly evident in films like The Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991), where the character of the T-1000—a shape-shifting, liquid metal Terminator—was brought to life with a combination of animatronics and silicone-based prosthetics. The flexibility and durability of silicone made it an ideal material for the complex, multi-faceted effects required for the film.
Foam rubber, another important material, became a staple in the creation of larger-than-life creatures and set pieces. It was lightweight and could be sculpted to resemble anything from giant monsters to the most intricate and detailed props. The use of foam allowed for large puppets, like the ones used in Labyrinth (1986), to appear realistic while still being manageable for puppeteers to control. In many ways, foam rubber was a bridge between the raw physicality of puppetry and the more advanced techniques that would follow.
These advancements in materials, combined with increasingly sophisticated sculpting and molding techniques, allowed filmmakers to create creatures, characters, and environments that felt more real than ever before. The lifelike quality of prosthetics and creatures was not just a technical feat; it also allowed for better actor interaction, more convincing performances, and a deeper connection between the audience and the on-screen world.
Material Science Enabling Lifelike Creations
With the rise of digital technology in the 21st century, the world of practical effects has evolved even further, leading to what we now call “hybrid workflows.” This is where the worlds of physical, on-set effects meet digital, computer-generated effects. Rather than replacing practical effects with digital techniques, filmmakers have embraced the combination of the two to create richer, more seamless visuals that push the boundaries of what’s possible.
The blending of practical and digital effects isn’t just about adding a bit of CGI here and there. It’s about using each tool to its strength. For example, physical props, prosthetics, and animatronics might be used to create lifelike elements that actors can interact with on set. These tangible objects provide a level of realism and physicality that pure CGI often can’t replicate. Then, digital effects come in to enhance the illusion—whether that means adding background elements, enhancing creatures, or creating things that were impossible to physically build.
Take, for example, films like Avatar (2009) and The Lord of the Rings trilogy (2001-2003). In Avatar, the creation of the alien world of Pandora wasn’t just about digital environments. While the lush jungles, floating mountains, and bioluminescent creatures were generated using CGI, the filmmakers used practical effects on set to give actors tangible props and environments to interact with.
The Na’vi, the film’s iconic blue humanoid characters, were portrayed with the help of motion capture technology, but their facial features and movements were influenced by makeup, costumes, and animatronics. This hybrid approach brought a level of authenticity to the performances and visual elements, creating a more immersive experience for audiences.
In The Lord of the Rings, the fusion of practical effects and CGI was essential in bringing the fantastical world of Middle-earth to life.
Director Peter Jackson and his team used real sets, miniatures, and practical prosthetics to create creatures like orcs and elves, as well as massive battle scenes.
But, the magic of CGI allowed for grander elements, such as the enormous scale of Gollum, and the digital landscapes that stretched across the world of Middle-earth.
This hybrid approach didn’t just create visually striking moments; it helped the actors engage more fully with the world around them, enhancing their performances.
Even more recent productions like The Mandalorian (2019) have taken hybrid workflows to new heights.
The show combines traditional physical effects with cutting-edge virtual production techniques, using massive LED screens instead of green screens to create immersive 360-degree sets.
These physical sets provide real-time reflections and lighting that interact with the actors and props, while the digital components can be seamlessly integrated into the final shot.
The result is a highly immersive, realistic world where practical and digital effects work hand in hand to create a cohesive visual experience.
The beauty of hybrid workflows lies in their ability to harness the best of both worlds. Digital effects bring immense flexibility, allowing for visuals that are too complex or impossible to create practically. Practical effects, on the other hand, ground the scenes in reality and give actors something to react to, adding a layer of authenticity. Together, these techniques create a synergy that results in a more engaging, believable cinematic experience.
Practical Effects in Different Video Production Sectors
Hollywood Blockbusters: Star Wars, Jurassic Park, the Lord of the Rings
When it comes to Hollywood blockbusters, practical effects have played an integral role in crafting some of the most iconic and visually captivating moments in cinema. While digital effects have grown in prominence, these big-budget films have often blended practical techniques with VFX to deliver a more immersive, engaging experience. Let’s take a look at a few films where practical effects truly shined.
Star Wars (1977) – Pioneering Practical Effects in Sci-Fi
When George Lucas created Star Wars in 1977, the film industry was on the brink of an effects revolution. But even in a universe full of spaceships, aliens, and epic battles, the filmmakers relied heavily on practical effects to bring these elements to life. Miniatures, puppetry, and optical compositing were central to the look of the original trilogy. For example, the Millennium Falcon, one of the most recognizable ships in cinematic history, was built as a detailed model that was filmed and enhanced with optical effects.
The creatures of Star Wars, like Chewbacca and Yoda, were brought to life using puppetry and animatronics. These practical creations gave the characters a real presence, with actors interacting directly with physical puppets on set. Even today, fans of the franchise praise the original films for their tactile feel, where you could almost touch the environments and creatures, even if they were far from our reality. Lucas and his team proved that practical effects could seamlessly blend with cutting-edge technology, setting the stage for the future of effects-heavy filmmaking.
Jurassic Park (1993) Blending Animatronics and CGI
Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park set new benchmarks in the world of visual effects, but what made it stand out was its masterful combination of practical and digital effects. The film’s dinosaurs were created using a combination of animatronics, puppetry, and life-sized models, which gave them a physical presence on set. The practical effects team, led by Stan Winston, crafted the T. rex and raptors using animatronics that could move, blink, and breathe. These incredibly realistic creations allowed actors to interact with the dinosaurs, making their performances feel authentic.
Where the film truly innovated, however, was in the use of CGI to bring the dinosaurs to life on a larger scale. While the animatronic models were used for up-close shots, digital effects were used to animate the dinosaurs in their full glory during action scenes, like the iconic T. rex attack. The combination of real-life models and CGI allowed for a seamless integration of the two techniques, making the dinosaurs appear both lifelike and awe-inspiring. Jurassic Park demonstrated how practical effects could anchor a fantasy world, while digital technology allowed filmmakers to explore realms beyond the physical.
The Lord of the Rings (2001-2003) – Pushing the Boudnaries of Practical Effects
Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings trilogy is a shining example of how practical effects, when used in conjunction with VFX, can create a world of unparalleled immersion. From the Hobbits’ costumes to the massive battle scenes, practical effects were central to making Middle-Earth feel alive.
One of the standout features of the trilogy was the extensive use of miniatures (or “bigatures”) to create large-scale sets like Minas Tirith and Helm’s Deep. These models were often filmed with motion-controlled cameras to create the illusion of sweeping epic landscapes. For scenes that required a more intimate touch, prosthetic makeup and costumes transformed actors into Orcs, Hobbits, and even Gollum—the latter being a prime example of combining motion capture with traditional practical effects. Gollum’s digital form was brought to life using Andy Serkis’ performance, but the detailed prosthetics and makeup helped ground his character in the physical world, allowing his movements to be more believable.
Moreover, the trilogy’s weaponry, armor, and creatures were created using old-school techniques like casting, sculpting, and foam armor. These real-world elements gave the world of Middle-Earth a genuine, lived-in feel, making it feel more tangible for the audience. The Lord of the Rings was a perfect blend of the old and the new—showcasing how practical effects could be used to create realistic, immersive fantasy elements while VFX expanded the scope of the story.
Indie Projects: The Fly, The Dark Crystal
When it comes to indie projects, practical effects take on a life of their own. Filmmakers in the independent scene often rely on practical techniques not just to save costs but to get creative and deliver unforgettable, hands-on experiences for audiences. Two films that stand out in this realm are The Fly (1986), directed by David Cronenberg, and Jim Henson’s The Dark Crystal (1982). These films show how, with ingenuity and resourcefulness, practical effects can elevate a film—making it feel raw, immersive, and completely original.
The Fly (1986) – Body Horror Meets Practical Effects
David Cronenberg’s The Fly is an iconic example of how practical effects can be used to evoke visceral horror and emotional depth. The director of special effects won n Oscar for his exceptional work on this film. He also worked on Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) to create melting faces. In this sci-fi body horror film, the main character, Seth Brundle (played by Jeff Goldblum), undergoes a horrific transformation after an experiment goes wrong, turning him into a human/housefly hybrid. While CGI could have easily been used for the transformation scenes, Cronenberg and his team leaned into practical effects to make the grotesque changes feel tangible and real.
The transformation sequences in The Fly are legendary because of the detail and physicality of the makeup and prosthetics. Special effects maestro Chris Walas and his team spent countless hours crafting elaborate prosthetics that allowed Goldblum to gradually morph into a grotesque insect-human hybrid. Each stage of the transformation was achieved through highly detailed prosthetics, animatronics, and makeup that gave each change a tactile, gritty realism. The use of practical effects here didn’t just serve the horror aspect of the story—it deepened the emotional stakes of Brundle’s transformation. The audience is not only horrified by what they see but also feels the weight of Brundle’s despair, made all the more impactful by the physical, in-your-face effects.
The Dark Crystal (1982) – Fantasy Brought to Life Through Puppetry
While The Fly represents the horror side of practical effects, The Dark Crystal takes a completely different approach, showcasing the magic of puppetry and animatronics in a fantasy setting. Created by Jim Henson and Frank Oz, this fantasy film is set in an entirely different world populated by mystical creatures, and the entire film is driven by hand-crafted, life-sized puppets.
Rather than relying on computer-generated characters or heavy digital post-production, the filmmakers used puppets, animatronics, and stop-motion techniques to bring the world of Thra to life. Every character in the film, from the evil Skeksis to the kind-hearted Gelflings, was meticulously crafted and operated by puppeteers, making each one feel alive in a tactile, almost otherworldly way. The use of physical characters allowed the actors to interact with their environment in a way that CGI wouldn’t have been able to replicate. The detail and expressiveness in the puppetry made the characters feel real—like they could actually walk and breathe.
The film’s intricate designs and its reliance on practical techniques are part of what gives The Dark Crystal its timeless appeal. The combination of puppetry, animatronics, and handcrafted costumes helps create a world that feels fully immersive, yet it all exists on a very human scale, built with the hands of the filmmakers. For indie filmmakers, The Dark Crystal is a perfect example of how practical effects can create a lasting legacy, even in a genre as fantastical as fantasy.
Amateur Projects: DIY Techniques and Accessible Tools
When it comes to amateur filmmaking, practical effects can be a game-changer—especially for filmmakers working with limited budgets and resources. DIY techniques and affordable tools allow budding filmmakers to get creative and craft memorable, sometimes surprisingly professional-looking effects. Whether you’re a first-time filmmaker or just an enthusiast trying to add some flair to your home projects, practical effects offer a way to enhance storytelling without needing a huge budget.
DIY Techniques: Getting Hands-On
One of the best things about practical effects in amateur projects is how accessible they’ve become. With the right tools and a little know-how, almost anyone can create a range of effects that look much more impressive than they cost. For example, simple effects like blood splatters or fire can be achieved using things as simple as corn syrup, food coloring, and squirt bottles. It’s all about getting creative with what you have on hand. Filmmakers can also use miniatures, puppets, and model props to create fantasy worlds or action sequences without the need for complex CGI.
Possibly the most iconic DIY techniques used in amateur projects is stop-motion animation. Filmmakers can create short animated sequences using nothing more than a camera, some models (which can even be made from household items), and an app or editing software for stitching frames together. Stop-motion is an incredibly accessible way to experiment with animation, even if you don’t have the budget for professional software or studios. It’s a technique that’s both hands-on and personal, giving filmmakers complete control over their creation.
Accessible Tools: From Budget to Professional-Level Effects
While DIY techniques are about getting creative with what you have, today’s filmmakers have a wider range of affordable tools to help elevate their work. Home video editing software like DaVinci Resolve or HitFilm Express offers powerful features for visual effects and compositing, enabling even amateurs to create effects that can compete with professional standards. In fact, many low-budget filmmakers have taken to 3D printing to design props or creatures that would be too costly or time-consuming to make by hand. With affordable foam and latex rubber, filmmakers can easily create props and costumes that are lightweight, durable, and look just as realistic as the ones you’d see in big-budget films.
Another trend in amateur filmmaking is the use of green screen technology. With just a simple green backdrop, inexpensive lighting kits, and free or low-cost software (like OBS Studio or even mobile apps), filmmakers can insert digital backgrounds or characters into their scenes, giving them a polished and professional look. It’s a way for indie filmmakers to create an immersive world without needing expensive VFX artists.
Examples of Great DIY Effects
For those starting out in filmmaking, examples of successful amateur projects can be a huge inspiration. Take, for instance, the viral “Star Wars fan films” created on shoestring budgets. These fan projects often feature impressive lightsaber battles, spaceship models, and even stop-motion animation, all made possible by dedication and DIY ingenuity. These fan films show how far creativity can go with basic practical effects, as long as you have the right tools and a willingness to experiment.
Another example is the rise of horror shorts on YouTube, where creators use practical effects like foam latex prosthetics and puppetry to craft creepy creatures or gruesome gore effects. These projects have gained attention for their high quality and immersion, proving that you don’t need a Hollywood budget to produce impressive work.
The Relationship Between Practical Effects, SFX Makeup and Costume Design
Collaborative Roles in Creating Believable Characters
When it comes to bringing characters to life on screen, creating a believable, immersive world isn’t just about fancy CGI or stunning VFX. It’s about the craftsmanship that goes into every practical effect, makeup, and costume. The collaboration between departments like practical effects, special effects (SFX) makeup, and costume design is what makes a character truly feel real and present in the world of the film. This close-knit teamwork is essential in creating characters that audiences not only believe in but also emotionally connect with.
First, we have the special effects makeup artists. These are the creative minds behind the prosthetics, wounds, and transformations that give characters their unique look. Whether it’s a terrifying alien creature, a mystical fantasy character, or the worn-down face of a war veteran, SFX makeup artists use a range of materials—such as latex, foam, silicone, and gels—to build out the physical appearance of the character. These artists work meticulously to design the details that make characters believable, such as the textures of skin, wounds, scars, or even age, and they play a pivotal role in helping actors physically embody their roles. For example, when turning an actor into a monster or fantasy creature, the makeup artists can help communicate a character’s backstory, personality, and even their physical movements by transforming the way the actor’s face or body is shaped.
Next, we have costume designers, who are responsible for dressing the characters in a way that suits the world they inhabit. These designers focus not only on style and design but on how the clothing tells a story about the character’s background, status, and journey.
For example, in a film like Mad Max: Fury Road (2015), the costumes are essential in communicating the film’s dystopian setting.
The torn, dusty clothing, paired with rusted armor and rugged boots, speaks volumes about the characters’ harsh survival in a desolate world. It’s not just about looking cool; every stitch is purposeful, adding depth and meaning to the character’s role in the film.
But the magic happens when the practical effects team enters the picture. Often working closely with makeup artists and costume designers, practical effects bring in the mechanics and special props that make a character’s actions feel real and tangible. From animatronics to puppetry, the practical effects team might design moving body parts, mechanical creatures, or prosthetic limbs that interact with actors on set. This allows the actor to physically engage with the environment, creating a connection between the character and the audience. Think of the terrifying predator in Predator (1987) or the legendary King Kong in King Kong (1933) – both characters are brought to life with a combination of animatronics and practical effects that allow them to move and interact naturally with the actors.
All these departments—makeup, costume design, and practical effects—work together to ensure that the character is not only visually convincing but also functional within the narrative. A costume or makeup job may look stunning on its own, but it’s the physical interaction between the actor and the effects that really sells the illusion. In The Dark Knight (2008), Heath Ledger’s portrayal of the Joker wouldn’t have been nearly as iconic without the intricate makeup that turned him into a chaotic villain.
Similarly, the intricately designed suit of Iron Man wouldn’t be as convincing without the practical and VFX elements working together to give it movement and weight. This collaborative synergy ensures that every character is more than just a collection of costume pieces, makeup, or mechanical devices—they become fully realized characters, with every detail contributing to their believability and emotional depth.
Collaborative Roles in Creating Believable Characters
When it comes to transforming actors into creatures, characters, or supernatural beings, prosthetics and wearable designs are where the magic happens. Over the years, there’s been a massive leap in the innovation of prosthetics, giving filmmakers the ability to create some of the most realistic and detailed characters ever seen on screen. These advances have blurred the line between what’s real and what’s make-believe, enabling artists to push the boundaries of practical effects in ways that weren’t possible in the past.
One game-changing development in prosthetics was the use of foam latex and later silicone prosthetics, both of which have revolutionized the process. Silicone prosthetics, in particular, have become a staple in modern SFX makeup due to their durability, flexibility, and ability to closely mimic the look of human skin. These materials provide a more natural appearance and texture, which is crucial for creating realistic characters. Silicone prosthetics also tend to withstand heat, moisture, and the physical demands of a shooting schedule better than their latex counterparts, making them the preferred choice in most high-budget productions.
In addition to materials, the technology behind prosthetics has advanced significantly. For example, the introduction of 3D printing has allowed prosthetics artists to create more intricate and detailed designs with faster turnaround times.
Artists can now scan an actor’s face or body, digitally model the prosthetics, and then print them with remarkable precision.
This has streamlined the creation process and given filmmakers even more freedom to create unique, out-of-this-world designs that would be near impossible to craft by hand.
But prosthetics don’t work alone—they’re often complemented by wearable designs. These designs go beyond simple costumes; they encompass everything from robotic suits to creature suits and even dynamic armor. Wearable designs can involve both the clothing and devices that move or interact with the actor, often in complex and dynamic ways.
For example, in The Terminator (1984), Arnold Schwarzenegger’s mechanical endoskeleton is a mixture of prosthetics and wearable elements, combining flexible materials with animatronics to create a fully functional character.
One of the most notable examples of innovation in wearable designs is motion capture suits, which have evolved from rudimentary green-screen suits to sophisticated designs that capture every nuance of an actor’s movement. This technology has become essential in films that require both physical suits and VFX, such as Avatar (2009) and The Lord of the Rings series (2001–2003). The suits allow for the recording of body movements and expressions that can then be translated into digital characters or enhanced by practical effects on set.
Practical Effects VS Virtual Effects (VFX)
Aesthetic Differences: Why Practical Effects Look More Authentic
When you watch a film that uses practical effects, there’s an undeniable tactile quality to the visuals that simply feels more real. Whether it’s the way a creature’s prosthetic moves or the texture of a model set, practical effects offer a sense of authenticity that digital effects can sometimes lack. This isn’t to say VFX are inherently bad, but there’s something about the physical presence of practical effects that creates a deeper emotional connection with the audience.
One key reason practical effects feel more authentic is the way they interact with their environment.
For example, when actors interact with real, physical objects—whether it’s a prop, a model, or an animatronic creature—their performances feel grounded.
They’re not acting against a green screen or imagining the scene; they’re reacting to something that’s right there in front of them.
There’s a certain spontaneity and realism in the way light, texture, and movement are captured on camera when the effects are real and physical. This “tactile realism” makes the scene feel more alive and immersive.
In contrast, virtual effects often rely on a computer-generated environment or object that exists only in pixels, and while modern VFX technology has made huge strides, it can still feel a bit detached from the physical world. While the level of detail and realism in digital creatures and landscapes has reached extraordinary heights, they still often lack the organic imperfections of practical effects. For instance, practical effects like makeup, animatronics, and physical models often carry tiny inconsistencies—like a slight shift in texture or a tiny mistake in the model’s shape—that make them feel more “alive” and relatable to human senses. These imperfections, often intentional, create a sense of warmth and tangibility.
Lighting and texture also play a huge part in why practical effects often have that “real” look.
When a practical effect is on set, it interacts with light in the same way everything else does.
The shadows cast on a puppet or a prop are real, adding depth and nuance to the scene.
Digital effects, on the other hand, often struggle to perfectly replicate the way light behaves in the real world, especially in complex settings like outdoor environments with changing weather conditions, or scenes that involve detailed interactions between characters and objects.
A great example of this contrast can be seen in movies like Jurassic Park (1993). The animatronic dinosaurs used in the film had a certain weight and texture to them that made them feel believable, especially when they interacted with the actors on screen. The moments where the dinosaurs were combined with CGI felt even more impactful because the physical models set a realistic foundation, making the digital creatures seem more convincing. On the other hand, films like The Matrix (1999) use VFX to create seamless action sequences that feel otherworldly but don’t carry the same weight as the interactions with physical, real objects.
Another important aesthetic difference is how physical effects age.
When films use practical effects, they age in a way that feels natural.
Old movies with practical effects can feel nostalgic and still hold up years later because the effects were rooted in real materials.
VFX, while incredibly detailed in the present, often age less gracefully. As technology improves, earlier VFX can look outdated, with certain animations or visual elements feeling “frozen” in time as software and rendering techniques advance.
In the end, it’s the combination of tangible realism and imperfections in practical effects that contribute to their authenticity. Digital effects, while incredibly powerful and essential in modern filmmaking, still have yet to fully replicate the visceral, human quality that physical effects bring to the table. Both VFX and practical effects have their places in filmmaking, but the authenticity and warmth of practical effects continue to resonate with audiences, making them an essential tool for creating truly immersive cinematic experiences.
Cost Considerations: Budgeting for Practical VS Digital Effects
When it comes to budgeting for practical effects versus digital effects, filmmakers face some important financial decisions that can significantly impact both the production process and the final outcome of the film. While the cost of practical effects can vary depending on the complexity of the effect, the use of materials, and the craftsmanship required, digital effects often involve a whole different set of costs tied to technology, software, and post-production teams.
Practical Effects: The Upfront Investment
Practical effects often come with a larger upfront cost, especially when they involve physical props, makeup, animatronics, or large-scale models. The costs can include materials (foam, latex, silicone, etc.), skilled labor (prosthetic artists, model makers, animatronics specialists), and equipment (specialized molds, rigs, or control systems for animatronics). In some cases, filmmakers may also need to build physical sets or costumes, which can significantly increase production costs.
For instance, in films like The Thing (1982), where the practical creature effects were essential to the horror of the film, a huge amount of resources went into crafting the life-like animatronics and costumes. The cost was high, but it paid off by creating a visceral, tangible experience that wouldn’t have been possible with CGI at the time.
One of the biggest benefits of practical effects, however, is that they’re often created before filming starts and can be reused, repaired, or modified as needed. This means that the cost tends to be more predictable and spread out over the pre-production and shooting phases. Once the effect is created, the filming process itself is much less reliant on post-production, which can be both time-consuming and expensive.
Digital Effects: The Long-Term Investment
On the other hand, digital effects often carry lower upfront costs in terms of materials and physical construction but come with a different set of financial challenges.
VFX requires significant investment in post-production, where the effects are created or enhanced using computer software. This involves hiring a team of highly skilled VFX artists, animators, and technical specialists, who can spend weeks, or even months, refining the digital elements.
For complex visual effects like large-scale explosions, futuristic cities, or massive creatures, VFX can become incredibly expensive, as the process requires significant labor, computing power, and rendering time.
For example, films like Avatar (2009) and The Lord of the Rings trilogy (2001-2003) heavily relied on VFX, and while they made massive technological strides, the cost of post-production work was astronomical. Much of the budget went into rendering and digital compositing, which required the use of state-of-the-art hardware and software. VFX also tend to require extensive revisions and fine-tuning, meaning that post-production can stretch over a long period, increasing costs.
Hybrid Effects: The Best of Both Worlds
Some films choose to combine both practical and digital effects, resulting in a hybrid approach that balances cost and creative possibilities. By using practical effects as the foundation and enhancing them with VFX, filmmakers can achieve a more immersive and cost-effective solution.
For example, in Jurassic Park (1993), animatronics were used for the close-up dinosaur shots, and CGI was used for the wide shots and complex sequences. This allowed the filmmakers to save on time-consuming and costly VFX work by using practical effects where they worked best, and enhancing the rest digitally. This hybrid approach helped maintain the authenticity of the physical effects while offering the flexibility and scale of digital effects.
The key financial benefit of this approach is that practical effects can be done more efficiently, while digital effects are used sparingly to achieve the unachievable. This gives filmmakers more creative flexibility without blowing the budget on digital effects alone. While practical effects are still generally costlier upfront, the combination of both can optimize production costs and reduce excessive spending on VFX-heavy sequences.
Inspiration for Everyday Video Production
Practical Effect Techniques Adaptable to Your Production
When it comes to practical effects, the best part is that you don’t need a Hollywood budget to use them effectively in your own productions. A lot of the techniques pioneered by big studios can be adapted to everyday video production with just a bit of creativity. For example, filmmakers often rely on DIY filters or even practical lighting setups to manipulate how a scene looks, much like you’d see in larger productions.
One cool technique worth mentioning is how filmmakers, like those behind the 2024 remake of Nosferatu, use DIY filters to get specific visual effects.
In Nosferatu (2024), the filmmakers used filters to mimic the look of night scenes during the day, effectively blocking out the red light and transforming bright, sunlit scenes into spooky, atmospheric “night” shots.
This approach is similar to using ND (Neutral Density) filters, which are commonly used in video production to tone down bright sunlight. Just as ND filters cut down on the intensity of daylight, these DIY filters helped achieve a moody, dramatic effect—without needing complex digital compositing or green screens.
These sorts of practical effects can really elevate the mood and atmosphere of your project, giving your scenes a richer, more authentic feel. Whether you’re shooting in daylight and want to create the illusion of night, or you’re using filters to add a stylistic flare, such techniques are adaptable and cost-effective.
DIY Tricks for Small-Scale Productions
For those working with smaller budgets or even doing personal projects, there are plenty of DIY tricks that can instantly make your video feel more professional. You don’t need a fancy camera or studio equipment to experiment with these—just some basic tools and a bit of elbow grease.
- Homemade Diffusers and Reflectors: A soft, evenly-lit scene can make a big difference in the look of your video. White bedsheets, shower curtains, or cardboard can be transformed into diffusers to soften harsh light. You can also use reflective surfaces like aluminum foil or even the back of a whiteboard to bounce light and brighten your subject, giving your shots a professional feel on a budget.
- Practical Smoke: Want to create an eerie, atmospheric look? You can use smoke machines, or even some creative alternatives like incense sticks, to add fog or haze to your shots. This is a simple way to create depth and texture in your scenes—without needing expensive equipment.
- DIY Filters: As we saw in Nosferatu (2024), using filters to control light and color in your shot is an effective way to make the most of your natural surroundings. Colored gels, for example, are inexpensive and can be used to tint your lighting, making a scene feel warm, cold, or even give it an old-timey look like you’d see in black-and-white films. You can easily get creative with plastic wrap, sunglasses, or even colored plastic sheets as filters for your lens, changing the mood of your scenes without needing digital color grading.
- Fake Practical Effects: Sometimes, even simple practical effects can work wonders. Need a quick explosion? Try camera shakes, added sound effects, or firecrackers for small, controlled bursts of visual drama. For blood effects, corn syrup mixed with red food coloring is a cheap, effective solution that looks pretty realistic on camera.
- Miniatures: Making a model set or using miniature figures can help you create big effects on a small scale. This can be particularly effective in fantasy or sci-fi genres, where you need to create larger-than-life landscapes or complex environments. Forced perspective (a technique where objects closer to the camera appear larger than those in the background) can make your tiny models look enormous.
Conclusion
Practical effects have always been an essential part of filmmaking, helping creators bring their most imaginative and compelling ideas to life. While VFX has undeniably expanded the possibilities of what can be achieved on screen, practical effects still hold a unique place in the industry. They offer a tangible realism and a sense of authenticity that digital effects sometimes struggle to replicate. The fusion of practical and virtual techniques, seen in modern films and indie projects alike, shows just how versatile and powerful this combination can be, elevating stories and creating immersive worlds.
Whether you’re working on a big-budget blockbuster, an indie project, or a DIY production, practical effects can be adapted to suit any scale. The beauty of these techniques is that they encourage creativity, and with some imagination, they can be incorporated into almost any project. From miniatures to DIY filters and hands-on prosthetics, the possibilities are endless, and with a little ingenuity, anyone can craft powerful visual moments that resonate with audiences.
As the world of video production continues to evolve, it’s clear that practical effects are far from obsolete. They remain a crucial tool in a filmmaker’s toolbox, one that adds authenticity, texture, and artistry to the storytelling process. By combining the best of both practical and digital effects, filmmakers can create richer, more dynamic experiences that push the boundaries of imagination and visual storytelling. So, whether you’re a seasoned pro or just starting out, don’t forget to embrace the magic of practical effects—they might just be the key to unlocking your most captivating cinematic visions.
Fullframe Creative provides a cutting-edge creative communication service: original concepts; clear, creative and concise content delivered competently.
In other words, we help you get your message across through the following tools and services:
- Video Production & Animation – corporate video, social media video, drone, interviews, interactive, video marketing, explainer videos, infographics, motion graphics and lots more.
- Digital & Social Media Marketing – digital concept development & strategy, web & interactive design, campaign strategy, design & management, copy & content writing, blogs & SEO.
- Virtual-hybrid Events & Tours / Video-conferencing – webinars, full event development & management, moderation & hosting, virtual visits.
- Media Training – public speaking & coaching, look & sound great on camera.
- Green-screen Production Studio – large video & photo production studio, 100% soundproof, professionally equipped 360° green-screen.
Fullframe has 15+ years of experience, 100+ satisfied customers and 1,000+ successful productions.
Let’s talk!
Spark up your Image!
Stand out for all the right reasons.
We help you communicate in a clear, creative and comprehensive manner.